We’re all familiar with the boiling frog theory. You put a frog in boiling water and he’ll jump out. You put a frog in room temp water over a flame and he’ll swim around till he cooks. Do we see this happening in our government? Many would say so. I think we’re ok right now personally. Some would say the Patriot Act was a hinge point and how they violated the Constitution by creating it…which is not he case but we’ll discuss that in a minute. However, this new issue caused me to raise an eyebrow. Z Backscatter Van (ZBV) are not the most recent inventions but more recently have been produced in an operative tempo far beyond their original purpose. The picture above is a ZBV. It doesn’t look much different than your standard moving van and definitely doesn’t display any indicators that there are x-ray cameras inside operated by two men. That’s right- the cameras are disguised and are engineered to see through clothes, cars, and even houses! The original purpose was to assign ZBVs in areas that merited observance in such a concealed manner i.e. borders, military installations, crime scenes etc. But now they’re going through neighborhoods at random without the consent of the citizens nor the authority of a court order. Now, does that make me mad? Not really. I have nothing to hide and anything that could be considered an embarrassment is only seen by few professionals so whatever. I’ve shown worse to doctors haha…sorry, moving on! So yes, that is in fact a violation of the Constitution which is the only thing that makes me angry. So, I’m done discussing the ZBVs. I want to discuss an issue that many have said is the reason we’re having these problems. The funnel I discussed earlier that has supposedly created a gradual increase in government control. The USAPATRIOT Act of 2001. Yes, it’s spelled that way. Contrary to common knowledge it’s an acronym! Uniting And Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism. A very effective yet controversial move made by the government to seize any propaganda that may elude to an act of terrorism. The boundaries have been broadened for law enforcement agencies to investigate personnel who are possible subjects or affiliates of a crime, or crime to be. Many citizens all the way up to the political realm have deemed such an act to be “unconstitutional” by violating our rights of privacy. I asked many who opposed the Act what the constitution says about our right to privacy and some didn’t even know. Others gave very intelligent sounding answers that were so inaccurate. “Invasion of privacy!” “My rights are being violated!” “The Constitution says they can’t come in my home!”…Ignorance! Do you know what elements of infraction must be met to constitute “invasion”? The government has every right to search ones living space given an appropriate court order such as a search warrant. Amendment 6 states that we have the right to be secure in our persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized. Yea, I copied it. Did you see that thing about the warrant? Guess what folks- contrary to popular belief the Patriot Act isn’t random. It is used in conjunction with Amendment 6. If cops have reason to believe someone is an affiliate of a crime and the absence of their investigation could result in an adverse manner well then they obtain probable cause, take it to the appropriate authorities, be granted a warrant so their justified. Here’s a line that infuriates me: “I’d rather sacrifice safety for freedom”. That doesn’t even make sense! You can’t have one without the other! Your safety is purchased with the brave men and women who are on the front lines of danger domestically and abroad. They keep you safe so you can have your blessed freedom! “Freedom isn’t free” we’ve all heard it. Without your safety you won’t be free, without surveillance and acts of intel ops such as the Patriot Act you won’t be safe. Therefore it is a poor argument. Rather sacrifice…psh! I bet people in New York City aren’t using that line! Who remembers last year (Sept ’09) when that haji and his dad planned to bomb NYC? I was assigned to the presidential protective detail (HMX-1) at the time and had fellow Marines there at the time awaiting Obama’s arrival. A rail system, sports stadium, and a building of high occupancy were the targets and its New York folks so do the math…that’s a lot of casualties. An FBI spokesman said that their primary line of defense was the Patriot Act, specifically phone line tapping. Potentially thousands of people would have been toast- but who cares, right? We want our freedom, we want our civil liberties, we want we want we want or we’re gonna kick and scream like a child at K-Mart. God forbid the government catch us picking our nose!
Instead of focusing on the government let’s take a look at ourselves and see how selfish we’ve become. The USAPATRIOT Act of 2001 was a reaction to the attacks of September 11th. The Act was published within days of the attacks. Think about if we were a bit more observant prior to. Think about how our shallow desires can cause such an influence. You can search any part of my house, car, office space whatever. If such measures cause a safer environment then so be it. Just a thought…


